Saturday, May 23, 2026

Iran's final offer on the war and the nuclear program made to Pakistani mediators

    Saturday, May 23, 2026   No comments

Iran proposes two-track peace deal while Trump weighs new round of strikes

Iran has submitted a sweeping two-track peace proposal to Washington through regional mediators, according to a senior Iranian official speaking to Drop Site News, as US President Donald Trump reportedly considers launching fresh military strikes as early as this weekend. The diplomatic gambit attempts to decouple immediate wartime cessation from long-term atomic disputes.

Under Track 1, Iran demands a formal declaration ending the war, the lifting of the US naval blockade on its ports, and the release of frozen assets, offering in return to provisionally reopen the Strait of Hormuz to maritime traffic while a new regional governance regime is finalized. Tehran is also demanding a multilateral compensation mechanism to fund domestic war damages and a total cessation of Israeli attacks in Lebanon.

The nuclear leverage is reserved entirely for Track 2, which would only commence after a formal end to hostilities. According to the Drop Site News report, Iran has offered major nuclear concessions, including a 10-year suspension of uranium enrichment above 3.6 percent, the supervised internal dilution of its 20 percent enriched stockpiles, and a binding commitment against developing nuclear weapons.

In exchange, the Islamic Republic expects full sanctions relief and the explicit recognition of its limited rights to enrich uranium under a future agreement. However, negotiations remain severely bottlenecked by the Trump administration’s insistence that a war-ending truce and a comprehensive nuclear deal be finalized simultaneously, alongside a rigid US demand that Iran completely forfeit all enriched uranium.

While diplomacy hangs in the balance, Iranian officials have made it clear they are prepared for a catastrophic regional escalation if Trump opts to restart the air campaign. In tandem with hardline warnings from chief negotiator Mohammad Ghalibaf—who stated on social media that Iran's armed forces have thoroughly rebuilt their capabilities during the six-week ceasefire and will deliver a response "more crushing and bitter" than the first day of the war.

Iran's chief negotiator vows crushing response if Trump resumes war

Iran has explicitly warned the US of a devastating retaliation if President Donald Trump aborts the current truce and resumes military operations against the Islamic Republic. The declaration came from Iran's chief negotiator, Mohammad Ghalibaf, who announced on social media on Saturday that the country's armed forces have comprehensively rebuilt their capabilities over the course of the six-week-long ceasefire.

Warning of the consequences of renewed hostilities, Ghalibaf stated on X (formerly Twitter), "Our armed forces have rebuilt themselves during the ceasefire period in such a way that if Trump commits another act of folly and restarts the war, it will certainly be more crushing and bitter for the United States than on the first day of the war."

According to a report by The Straits Times, the  warning directly follows a pivotal meeting in Tehran between Ghalibaf and Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, who is spearheading regional mediation efforts to conclude the war. Munir, who landed in the capital on Friday, engaged in marathon, late-night legal sessions with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and held a high-level audience with President Masoud Pezeshkian on Saturday to review proposed frameworks aimed at keeping the 8 April ceasefire from completely fracturing under recent US threats.

The regional diplomatic push has extended well beyond Pakistan's mediation track, as documented by the state news agency IRNA, which confirmed that Araghchi has held rapid-fire consultations with regional counterparts in Turkiye, Iraq, Qatar, and traditional backchannel facilitator Oman. Iranian leadership continues to accuse the White House of leveraging excessive demands during the talks.


Iran demands Gulf states pay full reparations for facilitating US-Israeli aggression


Iran has launched a major diplomatic offensive at the United Nations, demanding that neighboring Gulf states pay full reparations for their role in facilitating the devastating military campaign against the country. In a formal letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the Security Council, Iranian UN Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani declared that several regional governments bear strict international responsibility for aiding foreign aggression. The high-stakes move targets the strategic crossroad states that have long hosted American military infrastructure during the conflict.

The Iranian document explicitly names Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan, accusing them of actively participating in or enabling hostile operations against the Islamic Republic. Iravani argued that under established international law, these nations are legally obligated to provide comprehensive compensation for both material and moral damages suffered by Iran.

This diplomatic maneuver comes as Iran firmly rejects recent statements by US officials and dismisses counterclaims from nations on the southern side of the Persian Gulf as entirely baseless. By taking this battle to the UN Security Council, Iran is signaling that the fragile ceasefire will not grant immunity to the regional monarchies that opened their airspace and bases to US forces.





ISR Weekly

About ISR Weekly

Site Editors

Previous
Next Post
No comments:
Write comments


Trending now...


ISR +


Frequently Used Labels and Topics

40 babies beheaded 77 + China A Week in Review Academic Integrity Adana Agreement afghanistan Africa African Union al-Azhar Algeria Aljazeera All Apartheid apostasy Arab League Arab nationalism Arab Spring Arabs in the West Armenia Arts and Cultures Arts and Entertainment Asia Assassinations Assimilation Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Belt and Road Initiative Brazil BRI BRICS Brotherhood CAF Canada Capitalism Caroline Guenez Caspian Sea cCuba censorship Central Asia Charity Chechnya Children Rights China Christianity CIA Civil society Civil War climate colonialism communication communism con·science Conflict conscience Constitutionalism Contras Corruption Coups Covid19 Crimea Crimes against humanity D-8 Dearborn Debt Democracy Despotism Diplomacy discrimination Dissent Dmitry Medvedev Earthquakes Economics Economics and Finance Economy ECOWAS Education and Communication Egypt Elections energy Enlightenment environment equity Erdogan Europe Events Fatima FIFA FIFA World Cup FIFA World Cup Qatar 2020 Flour Massacre Food Football France Freedom freedom of speech G20 G7 Garden of Prosperity Gaza GCC GDP Genocide geopolitics Germany Global Security Global South Globalism globalization Greece Grozny Conference Hamas Health Hegemony Hezbollah hijab Hiroshima History and Civilizations Hormuz Human Rights Huquq Ibadiyya Ibn Khaldun ICC Ideas IGOs Immigration Imperialism In The News india Indonesia inequality inflation INSTC Instrumentalized Human Rights Intelligence Inter International Affairs International Law Iran IranDeal Iraq Iraq War ISIL Islam in America Islam in China Islam in Europe Islam in Russia Islam Today Islamic economics Islamic Jihad Islamic law Islamic Societies Islamism Islamophobia ISR MONTHLY ISR Weekly Bulletin ISR Weekly Review Bulletin Italy Japan Jordan Journalism Kenya Khamenei Kilicdaroglu Kurdistan Latin America Law and Society Lebanon Libya Majoritarianism Malaysia Mali mass killings Mauritania Media Media Bias Media Review Middle East migration Military Affairs Morocco Multipolar World Muslim Ban Muslim Women and Leadership Muslims Muslims in Europe Muslims in West Muslims Today NAM Narratives Nationalism NATO Natural Disasters Nelson Mandela NGOs Nicaragua Nicaragua Cuba Niger Nigeria Normalization North America North Korea Nuclear Deal Nuclear Technology Nuclear War Nusra October 7 Oman OPEC+ Opinion Polls Organisation of Islamic Cooperation - OIC Oslo Accords Pakistan Palestine Peace Philippines Philosophy poerty Poland police brutality Politics and Government Population Transfer Populism Poverty Prison Systems Propaganda Prophet Muhammad prosperity Protests Proxy Wars Public Health Putin Qatar Quran Rachel Corrie Racism Raisi Ramadan Ramadan War Regime Change religion and conflict Religion and Culture Religion and Politics religion and society Resistance Rights Rohingya Genocide Russia Salafism Sanctions Saudi Arabia Science and Technology SCO Sectarianism security Senegal Shahed sharia Sharia-compliant financial products Shia Silk Road Singapore Sistani Slavery Soccer socialism Southwest Asia and North Africa Sovereignty Space War Spain Sports Sports and Politics Starvation State Power State Terror Sudan Sunni Axis sunnism Supremacism SWANA Syria Ta-Nehisi Coates terrorism Thailand The Koreas Tourism Trade transportation Tunisia Turkey Turkiye U.S. Cruelty U.S. Foreign Policy UAE uk ukraine UN under the Rubble UNGA United States UNSC Uprisings Urban warfare US Foreign Policy US Veto USA Uyghur Venezuela Volga Bulgaria Wadee wahhabism War War and Peace War Crimes War on Iran Wealth and Power Wealth Building West Western Civilization Western Sahara WMDs Women women rights Work Workers World and Communities Xi Yemen Zionism

Search for old news

Find Articles by year, month hierarchy


WEEKLY AdSpace 3

_______________________________________________

Copyright © Islamic Societies Review. All rights reserved.