Western media and Western government reactions to Iran’s retaliatory attack on Israel raises serious concerns. Before sharing some of these reactions, some context, then some questions that would drive world community perception of governments' reactions to these developments.
On October 1, Iran struck several military and security
sites in Israel in response to Israel’s assassination of Haniyeh, Nasrollah,
and Iranian officials. Iran described the attack as “legal, rational and
legitimate”.
These positions might be convenient at the
moment. However, long term, the West might come to regret their reactions and
non-reactions to the events of the last weeks and months because their positions expose
their disdain to the life and dignity of other peoples, compared to how they avenge the deaths of their own. These are critical moments
that require principled response. Few
facts will illustrate the problem the West faces.
1. If Iran’s attack failed, why are Western governments condemning
it in the strongest terms possible? And did it fail because it did not kill
Israeli civilians? Because many of the rockets landed, and they seem to have
landed in specific locations, which means if they were aimed at civilian centers they would have landed in civilian centers. Is the West's measure of failure and success determined by the number of civilians killed?
2. Whenever Israel attacks another country and such attacks result in countless deaths of civilians including children and women, the West does not condemn such attacks; instead reaffirms Israel’s right for self-defense. If they believe in a principle of self-defense, Western governments need to answer the questions: Do other peoples and other countries have the right to such self-defense, too?
3. When Israel attacks in self-defense, civilians, including
children and women, as acknowledged by France’s president are killed. In fact,
in retaliation for the Oct. 7 attack, Israel killed 13 Palestinian children for
1 Israeli death for a total of 16,000 Palestinian chidlren and counting; or 33 Palestinians for 1 Israeli, for a total of 41,000 Gazans and counting. Is this an acceptable
formular for self-defense killings?
Answers to these questions are not an exercise in morality speak; answers to these questions can form a practical, sound foundation for ending the cycles of violence.
No comments:
Write comments