Friday, October 03, 2025

Trump Demands Israel "Immediately" Halt Bombing of Gaza, Hamas Agrees to Proposal

    Friday, October 03, 2025   No comments

In a significant and unexpected shift, former US President Donald Trump has publicly called on Israel to immediately cease its bombing campaign in the Gaza Strip, as the Palestinian group Hamas announced its acceptance of a comprehensive peace proposal he previously outlined.

The developments, which unfolded on Thursday, have introduced a potential breakthrough in the long-running conflict, injecting a new dynamic into stalled diplomatic efforts.


Trump's Direct Appeal and Hamas's Acceptance

The momentum began when Hamas issued a formal statement expressing its "immediate" readiness to enter into negotiations through mediators to discuss all details related to implementing an agreement. The group confirmed its agreement to release all captives, both living and the remains of the deceased, in line with the framework of Trump's plan.



In a swift response on his Truth Social platform, Trump amplified the possibility of a deal. He stated that the Hamas statement was "an indicator that they are ready for a permanent peace" and made a direct demand: "The American President Donald Trump has demanded that Israel stop bombing the Gaza Strip 'immediately' to allow for the release of the detainees in the strip."


Trump further revealed that "discussions are currently underway regarding the details that need to be worked on" to implement the plan for ending the war. He framed the moment as a critical juncture, emphasizing that the issue "is not only about Gaza, but about the long-awaited peace in the Middle East."


A Comprehensive White House Plan


The proposal at the center of the flurry of statements originates from a detailed plan released by the White House on September 29, 2025. That plan called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, to be followed by a comprehensive reconstruction program and a reorganization of the strip's political and security situation.


Hamas's statement aligned with several key aspects of this vision. The group renewed its prior agreement to hand over the administration of Gaza to a body of Palestinian independents, based on a national consensus and supported by broader Arab-Islamic backing.


Crucially, Hamas also signaled a significant political concession, stating that the provisions in Trump's proposal concerning the future of Gaza and the rights of the Palestinian people "are linked to a national position to be discussed within a comprehensive Palestinian national framework, in which Hamas will be included and will contribute to with all responsibility."


Unanswered Questions and the Path Ahead


While the statements from both Trump and Hamas mark the most positive diplomatic development in recent memory, the path forward remains fraught with challenges. The most significant immediate question is Israel's official response. The Israeli government, which has long maintained that military pressure is essential for securing the release of captives and dismantling Hamas's capabilities, has not yet publicly commented on these latest developments.


Furthermore, the "details" Trump mentioned as being under discussion are likely to be highly complex, encompassing the sequencing of the ceasefire and prisoner exchange, the guarantees for security, and the composition and authority of the proposed Palestinian administrative body.


For now, the world watches to see if this unexpected convergence of statements—a US political figure's direct demand, a White House plan, and Hamas's strategic agreement—can create the necessary momentum to halt the fighting and open a new, albeit uncertain, chapter for Gaza and the region.




Official statement issued by Hamas on its response to US President Trump’s proposal

"Out of concern to stop the aggression and genocide our steadfast people in the Gaza Strip are facing, and stemming from national responsibility and commitment to our people’s constants, rights, and supreme interests, the Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas has conducted extensive consultations within its leadership institutions, broad consultations with Palestinian factions, as well as discussions with mediators and friends, to reach a responsible stance in dealing with President Donald Trump’s plan.


After thorough study, the movement has made its decision and conveyed the following response to the mediators:


Hamas values the Arab, Islamic, and international efforts, as well as the efforts of US President Donald Trump, calling for an end to the war on Gaza, a prisoner exchange, the immediate entry of aid, rejection of the occupation of Gaza, and rejection of the displacement of our people from it.


In this framework, and in a manner that achieves an end to the war and a full withdrawal from the Strip, the movement announces its approval to release all occupation prisoners — both living and remains — according to the exchange formula outlined in President Trump’s proposal, with the necessary field conditions ensured for the exchange process. In this context, the movement affirms its readiness to immediately enter negotiations through mediators to discuss the details.


The movement also renews its approval to hand over the administration of the Gaza Strip to a Palestinian body of independents (technocrats) based on national Palestinian consensus and supported by Arab and Islamic backing.


As for the other issues in Trump’s proposal relating to the future of Gaza and the inherent rights of the Palestinian people, these are tied to a collective national position and to relevant international laws and resolutions. They will be discussed through a comprehensive Palestinian national framework in which Hamas will participate and contribute responsibly."

Qatar and other Arab government leaders react

Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesperson says Qatar welcomes Hamas’ acceptance of President Trump’s proposal to end the war in Gaza.



“We reaffirm our support for Trump’s call for an immediate ceasefire to facilitate the release of captives.”


He added, “We have begun working with our partners in mediation to continue discussions on the plan to ensure a resolution to the war.”


Egypt reacts to Hamas's statement:

Egypt expresses its appreciation for Hamas’ statement responding to the U.S. President’s plan

The Arab Republic of Egypt expresses its appreciation for the statement issued by Hamas in response to the plan proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump regarding ending the war in the Gaza Strip. The statement reflects the movement’s and the various Palestinian factions’ keenness to safeguard Palestinian blood and to unite efforts toward ending this war, which has been raging for nearly a year now. This position also reflects a genuine desire to move toward a political solution that fulfills the aspirations of the Palestinian people and lays the necessary foundations for achieving peace and stability in the region, as well as ending the current war in a way that paves the path toward the establishment of the independent Palestinian state.

Egypt also commends the efforts of U.S. President Donald Trump and his vision for achieving peace and stability in the region, emphasizing the importance of building on these efforts to achieve a comprehensive and just settlement of the Palestinian issue. This includes an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, ensuring the return of displaced Palestinians to their homes, and providing full humanitarian aid. It also includes beginning the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip and lifting the blockade imposed on it, in preparation for launching a political process aimed at achieving the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people, establishing their independent state, and ensuring its integration and coexistence in peace and security with all peoples of the region.

Egypt expresses its hope that this positive development will lead all parties to assume their responsibilities seriously in addressing the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip, guaranteeing the flow of humanitarian aid to its people, and working toward the release of hostages and detainees. It calls for engaging in negotiations to reach a new ceasefire agreement under international supervision and guarantees, based on President Trump’s vision and in line with international legitimacy and relevant resolutions, to put an end to this conflict and move toward achieving comprehensive peace in the region.

Egypt also reiterates its call for the international community, in coordination with all Arab, Islamic, and international partners — especially the European Union and the United States — to intensify efforts to achieve an immediate and sustainable ceasefire, end the bloodshed, lift the suffering of the Palestinian people, and begin the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.




Yemen Sanaa government response


Yemeni Armed Forces
To our heroic brothers in the "Hamas" and "Islamic Jihad" movements

We are not concerned with the details of the negotiations because the decision is in your hands, but we remain committed to the pledge.

Just as our supporting military operations began at your request, they will not stop except at your request and will resume whenever you ask.

Your fate is our fate, and we are with you until victory or martyrdom. And those who have wronged will know to what kind of return they will be returned.










Israel's reponse:


Barak Ravid from Axios reports:

An Israeli official said Netanyahu was caught off guard by President Trump’s response.

In late-night consultations following Hamas’s statement and before Trump’s announcement, Netanyahu described Hamas’s reply as a rejection of Trump’s proposal, the official said.

According to the same official, Netanyahu stressed the need to coordinate Israel’s response with Washington to avoid any impression that Hamas had accepted the U.S. plan.

However, professionals involved in the hostage negotiations viewed Hamas’s reply as generally positive — a step that could open a path toward a potential deal.
...
Other Hebrew media confirm this, some report that officials close to Netanyahu are calling it a 'surrender agreement', because it demands an immediate ceasefire before a hostage exchange and it does not mention the disarmament of Hamas.


Israel opposition leaders seem to want accept the deal with Hamas:




ISR Weekly

About ISR Weekly

Site Editors

Previous
Next Post
No comments:
Write comments

Followers


Most popular articles


ISR +


Frequently Used Labels and Topics

40 babies beheaded 77 + China A Week in Review Academic Integrity Adana Agreement afghanistan Africa African Union al-Azhar Algeria Aljazeera All Apartheid apostasy Arab League Arab nationalism Arab Spring Arabs in the West Armenia Arts and Cultures Arts and Entertainment Asia Assassinations Assimilation Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Belt and Road Initiative Brazil BRI BRICS Brotherhood CAF Canada Capitalism Caroline Guenez Caspian Sea cCuba censorship Central Asia Charity Chechnya Children Rights China Christianity CIA Civil society Civil War climate colonialism communism con·science Conflict conscience Constitutionalism Contras Corruption Coups Covid19 Crimea Crimes against humanity D-8 Dearborn Debt Democracy Despotism Diplomacy discrimination Dissent Dmitry Medvedev Earthquakes Economics Economics and Finance Economy ECOWAS Education and Communication Egypt Elections energy Enlightenment environment equity Erdogan Europe Events Fatima FIFA FIFA World Cup FIFA World Cup Qatar 2020 Flour Massacre Food Football France Freedom freedom of speech G20 G7 Garden of Prosperity Gaza GCC GDP Genocide geopolitics Germany Global Security Global South Globalism globalization Greece Grozny Conference Hamas Health Hegemony Hezbollah hijab Hiroshima History and Civilizations Human Rights Huquq Ibadiyya Ibn Khaldun ICC Ideas IGOs Immigration Imperialism In The News india Indonesia inequality inflation INSTC Instrumentalized Human Rights Intelligence Inter International Affairs International Law Iran IranDeal Iraq Iraq War ISIL Islam in America Islam in China Islam in Europe Islam in Russia Islam Today Islamic economics Islamic Jihad Islamic law Islamic Societies Islamism Islamophobia ISR MONTHLY ISR Weekly Bulletin ISR Weekly Review Bulletin Italy Japan Jordan Journalism Kenya Khamenei Kilicdaroglu Kurdistan Latin America Law and Society Lebanon Libya Majoritarianism Malaysia Mali mass killings Mauritania Media Media Bias Media Review Middle East migration Military Affairs Morocco Multipolar World Muslim Ban Muslim Women and Leadership Muslims Muslims in Europe Muslims in West Muslims Today NAM Narratives Nationalism NATO Natural Disasters Nelson Mandela NGOs Nicaragua Nicaragua Cuba Niger Nigeria Normalization North America North Korea Nuclear Deal Nuclear Technology Nuclear War Nusra October 7 Oman OPEC+ Opinion Polls Organisation of Islamic Cooperation - OIC Oslo Accords Pakistan Palestine Peace Philippines Philosophy poerty Poland police brutality Politics and Government Population Transfer Populism Poverty Prison Systems Propaganda Prophet Muhammad prosperity Protests Proxy Wars Public Health Putin Qatar Quran Rachel Corrie Racism Raisi Ramadan Regime Change religion and conflict Religion and Culture Religion and Politics religion and society Resistance Rights Rohingya Genocide Russia Salafism Sanctions Saudi Arabia Science and Technology SCO Sectarianism security Senegal Shahed sharia Sharia-compliant financial products Shia Silk Road Singapore Slavery Soccer socialism Southwest Asia and North Africa Sovereignty Space War Spain Sports Sports and Politics Starvation State Terror Sudan sunnism Supremacism SWANA Syria Ta-Nehisi Coates terrorism Thailand The Koreas Tourism Trade transportation Tunisia Turkey Turkiye U.S. Cruelty U.S. Foreign Policy UAE uk ukraine UN under the Rubble UNGA United States UNSC Uprisings Urban warfare US Foreign Policy US Veto USA Uyghur Venezuela Volga Bulgaria Wadee wahhabism War War and Peace War Crimes Wealth and Power Wealth Building West Western Civilization Western Sahara WMDs Women women rights Work Workers World and Communities Xi Yemen Zionism

Search for old news

Find Articles by year, month hierarchy


AdSpace

_______________________________________________

Copyright © Islamic Societies Review. All rights reserved.