When the EU submitted what it called the final draft of an agreement that would allow the US to rejoin the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA), commonly known as the Iran Deal, and when EU foreign policy coordinator described Iran’s response to the text as “reasonable”, many observers thought that a signing was just days away. Now, after receiving the US response to the text, many are skeptical that a deal is possible. Considering all the factors at play, it is unlikely that the US administration will be able to sign off on a deal before the midterm general elections. That is our best informed prediction, regardless of what the reporting seem to suggest. The conflicting statements, over this past few days, appear to bolster this prediction.
Just today, Thursday, Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir
Abdollahian stressed that Iran is still in the process of reaching a good,
strong and sustainable agreement, but that America should refrain from using
vague literature in the draft final text of the agreement.
Amir Abdullahian's statements came during a telephone
conversation with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi, during which they discussed
and exchanged views on bilateral, regional and international issues and
negotiations to lift the embargo.
In turn, Wang Yi said: "We reject unilateralism at the
international level and support Iran's reasonable demands in the nuclear
negotiations."
Today, the Coordinator of Strategic Communications in the US
National Security Council, John Kirby, confirmed that the United States at the
present moment is not close to an agreement with Iran on a deal regarding its
nuclear program.
Earlier, the European Union's foreign policy chief, Josep
Borrell, said he was "less optimistic" about a quick agreement to
revive the Iran nuclear deal than he was a short time ago.
No comments:
Write comments